
Studies using the Implicit Association Test (IAT) have shown that most people more easily associate men with science and women with the arts, men with careers and women with homemaking, and men with being leaders and women with being supporters.
For example, academic scientists who looked at identical résumés belonging either to “John” or “Jennifer” perceived Jennifer as less competent. They were less likely to offer to mentor Jennifer and were more likely to say they would hire John to be a lab manager. When asked what starting salary, they’d offer the two candidates based on the same résumé, they proposed a salary that was $4,000 (13%) higher for John than for Jennifer. And female scientists showed the same type of bias against Jennifer that male scientists did.
Fortunately, studies suggest that it may be possible to reduce bias in our minds and our workplaces. One study found that systematic consideration of personal judgments can help combat bias in the evaluation of women in leadership positions. Another university professor indicated that a program of anti-bias education improved the environment in their departments. Knowing about the unconscious associations and connections we hold is the first step toward correcting our biases.

使用隐式联想测试 (IAT) 的研究表明,大多数人更容易将男性与科学、女性与艺术,男性与职业、女性与家务,男性与领导者、女性与支持者联系起来。
例如,这些研究表明,在过目男性申请者和女性申请者的相同简历时,评估者们会普遍认为女性申请者的能力较差。他们不太可能主动提出指导女性申请者,而更有可能会聘请男性申请这担任他们的实验室经理。当被问及他们会根据相同的简历为两位申请者提供多少起薪时,他们为男性申请者提出的薪水比女性申请者高出整整13%。令人惊讶的是,在这些研究中,女性评估者对女性申请者表现出了与男性评估者相同的偏见。
幸运的是,研究表明,我们还是有可能去减少我们在思想上和工作场所中所持有的性别偏见的。一项研究发现,更加系统的考虑和判断问题的方式有助于消除对担任领导职位的女性的评价偏见。另一位大学教授表示,反偏见教育计划也已经在很大程度上改善了他们部门的环境。更加深入地了解我们所持有的隐式偏见是纠正偏见的第一步。